South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2011, adopted January 2006
Section 9 The rural areas
Introduction
9.1
This section of the plan contains the site-specific proposals for the rural areas of the district. For the purposes of this plan this is the district outside the four towns of Didcot, Henley-on-Thames, Thame and Wallingford.
9.2
There has been a moderate growth in housing in the rural areas over the last Local Plan period alongside significant job creation. These trends are likely to continue given that a number of major employment sites are located outside the four towns. The rural areas site-specific policies include major developed Green Belt sites; an allocation for the re-use of Fair Mile Hospital, Cholsey for housing and employment; significant employment provision at Chinnor Cement Works; policies for Mongewell Park and the Wilders site, Crowmarsh; Mackenzie Myers, Watlington; as well as a policy for Shotover Country Park.
Site-specific proposals in the Green Belt
9.3
PPG2 advises that major developed sites in the Green Belt may be identified and policies for the future of the sites may be included in the Local Plan where:
(a)
limited infilling at major developed sites in continuing use may help to secure jobs and prosperity without further prejudicing the Green Belt; and
(b)
complete or partial redevelopment may offer the opportunity for environmental improvement without adding to their impact on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.
The Council has identified Culham Science Centre, Oxford Brookes University at Holton and Sandford Sewage Treatment Works as major developed sites in the Green Belt. This part of the plan also contains a policy in respect of Number 1 Site at Culham.
Oxford Brookes University, Holton
9.4
Oxford Brookes University is on a split site and its original and main buildings are in Oxford City at Headington. The University has more recently leased Westminster College at North Hinksey. A number of sites have also been acquired and developed in recent years to provide student accommodation notably at Marston Road, Oxford. In 2001, the University had 16,000 full- and part-time students and employed 2,200 staff on permanent full- and part-time contracts, as well as 800 on temporary contracts. The Holton site in South Oxfordshire was the former Lady Spencer Churchill College which merged with the former Polytechnic in 1975. Policy RUR1 sets out the framework for the consideration of proposals for infill development on the site and Map 4 shows the boundary within which infill development can take place in principle. Policy RUR2 provides the framework for the consideration of redevelopment proposals at the Holton site. The Council would support the preparation of a development brief for the site to provide a comprehensive framework within which specific proposals could be considered.
Policy RUR1
Limited infill development at Oxford Brookes University site at Holton will be permitted provided that it would:
(i)
be located within the infill boundary shown on Map 4;
(ii)
have no greater impact on the purposes of including land in the Green Belt than the existing development;
(iii)
not significantly increase student numbers without commensurate additional residential student accommodation being provided;
(iv)
not exceed the height of the existing buildings, excluding the main tower; and
(v)
not lead to a major increase in the developed portion of the site.
Policy RUR2
Redevelopment at Oxford Brookes University site at Holton will be permitted provided that it would:
(i)
have no greater impact than the existing development on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land in it, and where possible have less;
(ii)
contribute to the achievement of the objectives for the use of land in the Green Belt;
(iii)
not occupy a larger area of the site than the existing buildings, unless this would achieve a reduction in height that would benefit visual amenity;
(iv)
not significantly increase student numbers without the provision of commensurate residential student accommodation;
(v)
not exceed the height of the existing buildings, excluding the main tower; and
(vi)
not result in the loss of important trees on the site or important wildlife habitats.
9.5
Oxford City Council has for many years been concerned about the impact of Oxford Brookes University's students on the housing situation in Oxford, as accommodation managed by the University caters for about 40% of full-time students. This is one of the factors that has led to pressure to release land in the Green Belt to provide further housing. A large amount of new housing accommodation for students has been completed by the University and further provision is planned; however, there is still considerable pressure on housing in Oxford and any further expansion to cater for more full-time students would be likely to exacerbate the problem. The Council is, therefore, unlikely to consider favourably proposals for buildings which enable student numbers to be significantly increased, without a commensurate increase in the residential accommodation available for students.
9.6
With the University being on a split site there has historically been a considerable amount of commuting between the Holton and Headington sites. The University has sought to lessen this impact through the provision of a regular bus service to Oxford and a Green Travel Plan. The Council is keen to ensure that new development on the site does not result in significant increases in commuting to other University sites and will look to the University to address this issue in the submission of planning applications and in its longer-term plans.
9.7
Map 4 defines the area of the site where limited infill development will be permitted, provided that it meets the criteria set out in Policy RUR1, and that it complies with the other policies relating to the Green Belt in Section 3 of the Plan. Infill development around the edge of the existing buildings should not exceed two storeys in height. Development in excess of two storeys may be acceptable within the inner area shown on Map 4, provided that it does not affect the openness of the Green Belt.
See Map 4: Oxford Brookes University, Holton.
9.8
Proposals for redevelopment will be considered against the criteria in Policy RUR2. In considering redevelopment proposals the Council will generally seek to protect the open parts of the site. There is, however, scope for redevelopment of the two-storey housing at College Close, locating replacement proposals closer to the main buildings complex. In addition, the original 1960s high-rise tower block forms an intrusive feature in the landscape and the Green Belt. The Council will, therefore, look sympathetically at proposals which would result in its demolition. Any such proposal would have to demonstrate the benefits of removal of the Tower against further development on the open land. In accordance with PPG2, the area for the purposes of RUR2(iii) will be taken to mean the aggregate ground floor area of the existing buildings (or footprint), excluding temporary buildings, open spaces between buildings, and areas of hardstanding. Proposals for infill and redevelopment should also comply with the other policies in this plan, particularly in Sections 3 and 4.
Culham Science Centre and the JET Project
9.9
In planning terms there are two distinct elements to the complex of research centres at Culham - the JET Project and Culham Science Centre. These sites and the former Overseas Development Natural Resources Institute (also known as No. 1 Site, Culham and dealt with below) were formerly a Royal Naval Air Station.
JET Project
9.10
The Joint European Torus (JET) Project was one of the projects in the co-ordinated fusion programme of the European Atomic Energy Community and is now owned and managed by the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA). The Project's long-term objective is the creation of safe, environmentally-sound, prototype, fusion reactors. Temporary planning permission was granted for the experiment in 1979. An exception to Green Belt policy was made because of the international significance of the project. It was originally intended that the project should end in the early 1990s but planning permission has now been extended to 2018. This allows for the clearance of the main experimental hall because it will be mildly radioactive. Following the cessation of the project no further development for employment purposes will be permitted on this part of the Culham site in view of its Green Belt location. For this reason this part of the site has not been designated as part of the major developed site in the Green Belt. The site boundary of the JET Project is shown on Map 5.
Culham Science Centre
Policy RUR3
Limited infill at Culham Science Centre will be permitted provided that it would:
(i)
be located within the infill boundary shown on Map 5;
(ii)
have no greater impact on the purposes of including land in the Green Belt than the existing development;
(iii)
not exceed the height of adjacent, existing buildings;
(iv)
not lead to a major increase in the developed portion of the site; and
(v)
not significantly increase the numbers employed on the site or alternatively the number of employees travelling to and from the site by car.
Policy RUR4
Redevelopment at Culham Science Centre will be permitted provided that it would:
(i)
have no greater impact than the existing development on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land in it, and where possible have less;
(ii)
contribute to the achievement of the objectives for the use of land in the Green Belt;
(iii)
not exceed the height of existing buildings;
(iv)
not occupy a larger area of the site than the existing buildings and where possible less; and
(v)
not significantly increase the numbers employed on the site or alternatively the number of employees travelling to and from the site by private car.
Policy RUR5
The change of use of existing buildings to Class B1, B2 and B8 uses at Culham Science Centre will be permitted provided that it would;
(i)
have no greater impact than the existing development on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land in it, and where possible have less;
(ii)
not significantly increase the numbers employed on the site or alternatively the number of employees travelling to and from the site by private car.
9.11
The United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority established Culham Science Centre (formerly Culham Laboratory) in the early 1960s as a government centre for research into controlled thermo-nuclear reactions and plasma physics. Although it was then proposed to include this area within the Green Belt, the County Council granted permission on the basis of the national importance of this type of research. The site at Culham was considered particularly suitable because it was close to Harwell Laboratory and Oxford University where similar types of research were being carried out. In spite of the exception to policy being made, no restrictive conditions were imposed on the planning permissions.
See Map 5: Culham Science Centre.
9.12
Culham Science Centre is organised into a number of businesses forming part of a single service organisation. The majority of the buildings could be used for B1 purposes by other firms or organisations without the need for planning permission and some of the buildings are now used by other organisations. Infill development will be permitted within the central area of the site defined on Map 5.
9.13
Proposals for infill development should not exceed the height of surrounding buildings. Proposals for redevelopment of the site will be considered in relation to Policy RUR4. PPG2 Annex C indicates that such site should be considered as a whole and any proposals for partial redevelopment should be put forward in the context of comprehensive long-term plans for the site as a whole. Proposals for infill development, redevelopment or change of use of existing buildings should not significantly increase the numbers employed on the site or alternatively, the number of employees travelling to and from the site by private car. When considering proposals which would increase the numbers employed on the site the Council will base its calculations on the potential number of additional employees that could result from a specific proposal for new buildings or changes of use of existing buildings taking into account any demolitions. The cumulative effect of proposals on the numbers employed will also be included. In demonstrating that a proposal would not significantly increase the number of employees travelling to and from the site by private car, the applicant will need to show that measures have been put in place which have achieved a proven reduction in the number of employees travelling to the site by car so that the impact of any new proposal and the likely proportion travelling by car can be properly assessed. Proposals will also be considered in the light of traffic and travel implications in accordance with PPG13 and should comply with the other policies in this plan.
Number 1 Site, Culham
Policy RUR6
Limited infill at Number 1 Site Culham will be permitted provided that it would:
(i)
be located within the infill boundary shown on Map 6;
(ii)
have no greater impact on the purposes of including land in the Green Belt than the existing development;
(iii)
not exceed the height of adjoining buildings within the infill boundary;
(iv)
not lead to a major increase in the developed portion of the site; and
(v)
not significantly increase the numbers employed on the site or alternatively the number of employees travelling to and from the site by car.
Policy RUR7
Redevelopment at Number 1 Site Culham will be permitted provided that:
(i)
the proposals form a comprehensive scheme for the development of the site;
(ii)
existing buildings and hardstandings are removed and provision made for returning undeveloped land to a state fit for agriculture;
(iii)
it would result in material improvements to the openness of the Green Belt by grouping buildings in the central part of the site;
(iv)
it would contribute to the achievement of the objectives for the use of land in Green Belts;
(v)
it would not exceed two storeys in height;
(vi)
it would not occupy a larger area of the site than the existing buildings and where possible less; and
(vii)
it would not significantly increase the numbers employed on the site or alternatively the number of employees travelling to and from the site by car.
Policy RUR8
The change of use of existing buildings to Class B1, B2 and B8 uses at Number 1 Site, Culham will be permitted provided that it would:
(i)
have no greater impact than the existing development on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land in it, and where possible have less;
(ii)
not significantly increase the numbers employed on the site or alternatively the number of employees travelling to and from the site by private car
9.14
Number 1 Site, Culham was formerly owned by the Government and during the Second World War was also part of the Royal Naval Air Station. Most of the buildings were constructed as wartime works. From 1968 the buildings were used by the Natural Resources Institute and the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food for storage, distribution, workshops, offices and research. In 1996 the site was sold to a private company and a number of individual occupants began to use the site for a variety of uses.
See Map 6: Number 1 Site, Culham.
9.15
The buildings are lawful but the uses taking place on the site in 2001, including the areas of hardstanding used for outside storage, remain vulnerable to enforcement action. The Council recognises that these buildings and some of the uses have a harmful impact on the openness of the Green Belt and wishes to see the site sensitively redeveloped. The buildings are dispersed throughout the site. They are generally unattractive due to their bulk, height and form, and the materials used in their construction.
9.16
All proposals should comply with all other relevant policies in the plan including Policy E5 and those for transport in Section 8. Policy T10 will be relevant for proposals which involve the use of heavy goods vehicles. When considering proposals which would increase the numbers employed on the site, the Council will base its calculations on the potential number of employees that could result from a specific proposal for new buildings or changes of use of existing buildings taking into account any demolitions. The increase in jobs will be related to the number of jobs in any lawful use which would be lost by any proposal for redevelopment or change of use. The cumulative effect of proposals on the numbers employed will also be included. In demonstrating that a proposal would not significantly increase the number of employees travelling to and from the site by private car, the applicant will need to show that measures have been put in place which have achieved a proven reduction in the number of employees travelling to the site by car so that the impact of any new proposal and the likely proportion travelling by car can be properly assessed.
9.17
Redevelopment proposals for Culham Number 1 Site should be comprehensive, comply with the criteria in Policy RUR7, and result in material improvements to the openness of the Green Belt with any new buildings grouped into the central part of the site. As part of any comprehensive scheme, existing buildings and hardstandings should be removed and provision made for returning undeveloped land to a state fit for agriculture. The extent and height of new buildings will be limited with tree planting carried out and appropriate arrangements for the future management of the land.
Sandford Sewage Treatment Works
Policy RUR9
Redevelopment and limited infill development at Sandford Sewage Treatment Works will be permitted provided that it would:
(i)
be within the development boundary shown on Map 7;
(ii)
be for purposes associated with the operational use of the site;
(iii)
not exceed two storeys in height; and
(iv)
provide for adequate access and not result in problems on the wider highway network.
9.18
Sandford Sewage Treatment Works is located within South Oxfordshire, south of the boundary with Oxford City. The site comprises a number of structures such as tanks and fixed plant as well as a number of buildings, including ancillary office space. Although there are some two-storey structures on the site, the greatest proportion of development is single storey or lower. The Works is well screened, lying in a natural hollow in the landscape and within the site there are relatively large areas which remain open. For these reasons the site has a very limited impact on the openness of the Green Belt.
9.19
Within the development boundary shown on Map 7 infill development connected with the operational use of the site will be permitted provided that the proposal is no greater than two storeys in height, has no greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than the existing development, and complies with the other policies in this plan.
See Map 7: Sandford Sewage Treatment Works.
Other site-specific proposals
Fair Mile Hospital, Cholsey
9.20
Fair Mile Hospital, as shown on the Proposals Map and Map 8, was built as an asylum and opened in 1870. The principal hospital buildings are listed Grade II and the Chapel and Lodge are listed separately at Grade II. The hospital is also included on English Heritage's Register of Parks and Gardens as a Grade II site. The site also includes a number of more modern buildings. The hospital is due to close in March 2003. A planning brief for the site was adopted by the Council as supplementary planning guidance in February 2003.
See Map 8: Fair Mile Hospital, Cholsey.
Policy RUR10
Proposals for the re-use of Fair Mile Hospital, Cholsey will be permitted provided that they:
(i)
provide a comprehensive scheme for the re-use of the buildings worthy of retention and for the future management of the site;
(ii)
secure a mix of uses for the buildings worthy of retention consistent with the need to preserve the listed buildings and the historic park and garden;
(iii)
provide for the demolition of buildings unsuitable for re-use;
(iv)
retain as open land the undeveloped parts of the site which are of historic interest and all the undeveloped land between the buildings and the River Thames and protect, in particular, the biodiversity interest of the land adjacent to the River Thames;
(v)
provide a management plan for the future maintenance of the listed buildings and the grounds;
(vi)
provide a comprehensive landscaping scheme which includes provision for the protection and enhancement of the historic park and garden and for the maintenance of important trees and other landscape features, as well as new planting in certain areas;
(vii)
protect the biodiversity interest of the site;
(viii)
provide for a package of sustainable transport measures;
(ix)
comply with the policies for encouraging sustainable and high-quality development in Section 4 of the plan; and
(x)
in the case of proposals for housing, provide for 40% of the residential units to be affordable housing in accordance with Policy H9; for a range of dwelling sizes in accordance with Policy H7; and for recreation, education, library and any other necessary on- or off-site infrastructure or services in accordance with Policy D11.
9.21
Proposals for the re-use of the site should relate to the whole site. Only proposals for the re-use of the George Schuster building could be considered separately. As a first stage, the Council will require the submission of a Conservation Plan setting out the significance of the site and explaining how that significance will be retained in any future use. The Council adopted a planning brief for the site as supplementary planning guidance in February 2003.
9.22
As far as future uses are concerned, the main objective is to secure the long-term future of the historic asset. This includes both the buildings worthy of retention and their setting. It is likely that any re-use will include a significant element of residential development, but other uses such as business, hotel, leisure or institutional uses may also be appropriate. There are a number of buildings on the site which are unsuitable for residential conversion and any scheme should provide for appropriate uses for these buildings which include the former farm, the Chapel and the theatre. A mixed-use scheme which reflects the diversity of the buildings on the site and reduces the need to travel will therefore be sought.
9.23
The site also contains a number of modern, post-war, utilitarian buildings which detract from the site and which should be demolished. Any replacement floorspace will only be permitted if it is required to secure the long-term future of the listed building and meets the criteria set out in the English Heritage Policy Statement Enabling Development and the Conservation of Heritage Assets. The Council will be most unlikely to permit any increase in floorspace on the site.
9.24
Given the status of the site as a historic park and garden any scheme should include provision for maintaining and enhancing the grounds of the former hospital. Any new development on the open land between the existing buildings and the River Thames, or which would be detrimental to the historic park and garden, will not be permitted. A comprehensive landscaping scheme should be prepared. Particular care will be needed with regard to the provision of car parking to ensure that this does not have an adverse effect on the setting of the listed buildings and the historic park and garden. The land bordering the River Thames is a BBOWT reserve and any scheme should make provision for the continuing future management of this area.
9.25
The site is not considered to be in a sustainable location for development in terms of reducing the need to travel and encouraging the use of walking, cycling and public transport. A package of sustainable transport measures will therefore be sought. In accordance with Policy D8, the development should demonstrate high standards in the conservation and efficient use of energy, water and materials.
9.26
A number of other policies in this plan are likely to be of relevance depending on the nature of the proposals, particularly those in Sections 3 and 4 of the plan. In the case of proposals for housing, the Council will seek the provision of 40% of the residential units as affordable housing.
Chinnor Cement Works
Policy RUR11
Proposals for the redevelopment of the former Chinnor Cement Works will be permitted provided that they:
(i)
provide a comprehensive scheme for the re-use of the whole area of the former Cement Works as shown on the Proposals Map;
(ii)
make provision for the long-term use and maintenance of the chalk pits in a way which recognises the amenity, geological and ecological value of the pits and their potential for quiet countryside recreation;
(iii)
provide for the redevelopment of the area covered by buildings, as shown hatched on the Proposals Map, for 3.8 hectares of housing and 1 hectare of B1 and B2 employment uses and/or appropriate commercial leisure uses;
(iv)
provide for a mix of size of employment uses with an element of small units to encourage small, local businesses;
(v)
provide for 40% of units to be affordable housing in accordance with Policy H9 and a range of dwelling types and sizes in accordance with Policy H7;
(vi)
provide a comprehensive landscaping scheme for the site;
(vii)
provide for the continued operation of the Chinnor/Princes Risborough railway line and protect the former line to the south west from development which may prejudice re-use in accordance with Policy T6; and
(viii)
provide for adequate pedestrian, cycle and vehicular access and contribute to any necessary on- or off-site works, including sustainable transport measures, education, library and recreational and community facilities in accordance with Policy D11.
9.27
Chinnor Cement Works is a site of 75 hectares to the south of Chinnor at the foot of the Chilterns where chalk extraction has taken place since before 1947. The works have now closed leaving an extensive area of former chalk pits and an area of 6.3 hectares covered by the buildings used for the manufacture of cement. The southernmost pit lies within the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and is a geological SSSI.
9.28
The Council considers that the site should be considered comprehensively and a planning brief for the site has been prepared and was adopted as supplementary planning guidance in September 2004. Any proposals for the site should include securing the long-term use and maintenance of the open areas of the site, having regard to safety considerations. Such proposals should maintain, and where possible enhance, the amenity, ecological and geological value of the site. The Ridgeway long-distance path runs through the site and this route should be protected and consideration given to enhancing access to and from it.
9.29
Any new buildings should be restricted to the area of the existing buildings defined on the Proposals Map and shown on Map 9. To reduce their impact on the landscape the buildings should not generally exceed two storeys in height. It is estimated that taking into account the access to the site and the need for a landscaped buffer adjacent to the railway line, some 4.8 hectares of the land forming the current access and occupied by buildings can be developed. Of this 3.8 hectares should be developed for housing. Of this 40% should be affordable housing and pepperpotted throughout the site in accordance with Policy H9. A range of sizes and mix of dwellings should also be provided in accordance with Policy H7. Given the site's history of employment provision and the lack of a wide range of employment opportunities in Chinnor, it is also considered that 1 hectare of B1 (business) and B2 (general industrial) uses would be appropriate. A range of size of units should be provided, including small units to encourage new businesses and medium-sized units to allow for the growth of existing businesses in the area. As an alternative, or in addition to employment uses, appropriate commercial leisure uses, such as a hotel, may also be permitted on the existing developed part of the site. All proposals must accord with other relevant policies in the plan, particularly those in Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8.
See Map 9: Chinnor Cement Works.
9.30
Any scheme should provide for the continued operation of the Chinnor/Princes Risborough railway line and not prejudice the future use of the disused part of the line to the south-west. A comprehensive landscaping scheme for the site will be required and any proposals will need to comply with the relevant policies in Section 4 of this Plan. Further work will need to be done on the traffic implications of the proposal and planning permission will not be granted until the highway issues are resolved satisfactorily. Access considerations may limit the amount of development that will be permitted on the site. Provision will need to be made for pedestrian, cycle and vehicular access to the site and off-site works may be required. There is also likely to be a need for contributions towards necessary on- or off-site services and infrastructure including sustainable transport measures, education, library, and recreational and community facilities in accordance with Policy D11.
Mongewell Park, Crowmarsh
9.31
Mongewell Park occupies a site of 30 hectares between the River Thames and the A4074 road, to the south of the Wallingford/Crowmarsh bypass. Until 1997 it was occupied by Carmel College, a Jewish foundation boarding school, which acquired Mongewell Park in 1953. At that time the site included a substantial mansion house and roadside lodge (a Grade II listed building), a wet boathouse, a mill house and a stable block. Carmel College erected a number of buildings from the 1960s. They include a synagogue (a Grade II listed building designed by Thomas Hancock), a dry boathouse and art gallery (a Grade II* listed building designed by Sir Basil Spence), and a Grade II listed open-air amphitheatre. Many of the other buildings are flat-roofed teaching blocks or dormitories, generally two storeys in height. There are also several prefabricated and temporary buildings on the site which detract from its overall appearance. To the north of the lake are the former headmaster's house, a bungalow and the former stables block, which was significantly altered and extended and used as a dormitory. To the east are a number of former staff houses, some of which have now been sold.
See Map 10: Mongewell Park, Crowmarsh.
9.32
Immediately to the north of the lake, enclosed by the estate grounds but in separate ownership, are the ruins of the Church of St John the Baptist, a Grade II listed building. To the south of the main complex of buildings are extensive playing fields. The site lies within the Chilterns AONB and has an extremely attractive parkland setting. The site is covered by an extensive 1950 Tree Preservation Order. The unclassified road inside the eastern boundary is part of a bridleway which forms the Ridgeway Path and from this a public footpath leads to the former Church of St John the Baptist.
9.33
The site should be considered comprehensively and a planning brief for the site should be prepared and adopted as a supplementary planning document. Any proposals for the site should include retention and enhancement of the open areas of the site. A comprehensive landscaping scheme should be provided which makes provision for the protection and enhancement of the parkland setting, the important individual trees and groups of trees and the other important landscape features of the site, such as the lakes and ponds. Any proposals should also make provision to secure the long-term maintenance of the site. In addition, the archaeological and biodiversity interests of the site should be comprehensively assessed and any proposals should incorporate measures for the protection and enhancement of these interests. Particular attention should be given to the area of nature conservation interest to the west of the Ridgeway Path.
Policy RUR12
Proposals for the re-use of Mongewell Park, Crowmarsh will be permitted provided that they:
(i)
provide a comprehensive scheme for the re-use of the buildings worthy of retention and for the future management of the site;
(ii)
secure a mix of uses on the site which reflect the nature of the buildings to be re-used and take into account the policies for particular uses in this plan;
(iii)
provide for the demolition of buildings unsuitable for re-use;
(iv)
protect the listed buildings on the site and their setting;
(v)
retain as open land the undeveloped parts of the site and make provision for any additional car parking needs within the existing complex of buildings;
(vi)
provide a comprehensive landscaping scheme which includes provision for the protection and enhancement of the AONB and parkland and the maintenance of important trees or groups of trees and other landscape features, such as lakes, ponds and the bank of the River Thames;
(vii)
provide a management plan for the future maintenance and enhancement of the site including the listed buildings and its amenity and biodiversity value;
(viii)
protect the archaeological interest of the site;
(ix)
ensure that there is no loss of flood storage capacity;
(x)
comply with the policies for encouraging sustainable and high-quality development in Section 4 of the plan;
(xi)
make provision for adequate access and for sustainable transport measures; and
(xii)
provide for any necessary on- or off-site infrastructure in accordance with Policy D11.
9.34
The Council considers that any proposals should seek to re-use the existing buildings on the site.
9.35
There are a number of buildings on the site which are of a temporary nature, in that they are single-storey prefabricated buildings. These buildings detract from the appearance of the site, are not suitable for re-use and should be removed. There are also a number of listed buildings or structures on the site, and the mansion house and wet boathouse, whilst not listed, are attractive buildings. In considering any proposals for re-use, careful attention needs to be given to identifying suitable uses for these buildings which preserve their character and setting. The dormitories and teaching blocks are generally 1960s buildings. If in good repair they should be capable of re-use, or an alternative use should be identified. If not redevelopment may be permitted if there is a significant environmental benefit and no material increase in height, footprint or floorspace.
9.36
The Council considers that the existing use as a residential institution remains the most suitable. However, alternatives will be considered and a mix of uses may also be appropriate. These could include a hotel and/or conference centre, B1 employment use and either residential or residential care in the mansion house and stables.
9.37
The site also contains a number of recreational facilities. These include the boathouses, the swimming pool and the playing fields. Policy CF1 of this Plan provides for the retention of such facilities and the desirability and practicality of retaining these facilities and the possibility of community use of them needs to be addressed. There is also the potential for community use of some other buildings which should be investigated. Opportunities to increase public access to the river frontage would also be supported.
9.38
The site is accessed by a relatively narrow road from the A4074. The access and wider transportation implications of any new uses would need to be considered. The attractive parkland setting of the site should not be prejudiced by extensive areas of new car parking. Any additional car parking needs identified should be met within the existing complex of buildings and not compromise the setting of the important buildings. In order to reduce the need to travel by car and encourage the use of walking, cycling and public transport, a package of sustainable transport measures will be sought.
9.39
Any proposals should comply with the requirements and standards of development set out in the preceding sections of this plan.
The Wilder's site and adjoining land, Crowmarsh
Policy RUR13
Proposals for the redevelopment of the Wilder's site and adjoining land, Crowmarsh, as shown on Map 11 for housing will be permitted provided that they:
(i)
provide a comprehensive scheme for the whole site;
(ii)
provide for the relocation of the existing agricultural machinery use;
(iii)
provide an open landscaped area between the housing area defined on Map 11 and the Riverside Park;
(iv)
provide a new access to the Riverside Park and maintain and improve the access to the Crowmarsh recreation ground;
(v)
incorporate any necessary remedial works to contaminated land;
(vi)
incorporate proposals for the alleviation of flood risk and flood compensation measures;
(vii)
comply with the policies for encouraging sustainable and high quality development in Section 4 of the Plan; and
(viii)
provide for affordable housing in accordance with Policy H9, for a range of dwelling sizes in accordance with Policy H7 and for any necessary on- or off-site infrastructure in accordance with Policy D11.
9.40
This 0.85 hectare site is shown on the proposals map and Map 11 overleaf. It is currently occupied by Lister Wilder agricultural machinery and a number of motor repair workshops. In order to secure improvements to the site and avoid problems of further unneighbourly uses it is essential that a comprehensive scheme for the whole site is provided. The Council also has a policy to protect employment uses, and although there would be environmental advantages in the redevelopment of this site it is important that an alternative site is found for the continuation of the agricultural machinery business. The Council will therefore seek a legal agreement requiring the securing of an alternative site for this business before any redevelopment takes place on this site.
See Map 11: Wilder's site and adjoining land, Crowmarsh Gifford.
9.41
The site is in a sensitive location, close to the River Thames, the Chilterns AONB and Wallingford Conservation area. The area currently used for open storage to the west of the proposed housing area also forms an important open gap between Crowmarsh and Wallingford. It is therefore important that this area is kept open and a comprehensive landscaping and management scheme is submitted with any planning application. Provision should be made for an improved access to Riverside Park through this area. Any scheme should also provide for an improved, safer access to the village recreation ground to the north of the site.
9.42
Remedial work will be needed where ground contamination has been found. Flood alleviation and compensation works will also be required as will archaeological evaluation and, if appropriate, mitigation measures.
9.43
In relation to the housing development, a high standard of design will be sought. Affordable housing should be provided in accordance with Policy H9 and a mix of housing in accordance with Policy H7. Any necessary on- or off-site infrastructure must also be provided in accordance with Policy D11.
9.44
The Council would support the retention of the service trade uses on the land to the east of the allocation and would support any redevelopment proposals which retained the uses and enhanced the appearance of the area and, in particular, the access arrangements and frontage to The Street.
Siarey's Timber Yard, Chinnor
This policy has not been saved beyond 19 January 2009 and will no longer be used.
Policy RUR14
Land at Siarey's Timber Yard is considered suitable for B1 uses.
9.45
The whole of Siarey's Yard was allocated in the Local Plan 1997 for employment use. Outline planning permission was subsequently granted for housing on the land adjacent to Oakley Road in 1999 and a further outline application has been submitted for housing on the northern and southern parts of Siarey's Yard. Given that the principle of housing development has been accepted on part of the site, it is not considered appropriate to allocate that part of the site for employment use. The remaining area of land on the site, identified overleaf, is allocated for B1 use and covers 1.05 hectares. Planning permission was granted for light industry and B1 office use in 1999. Any proposal will need to comply with the relevant policies in Sections 4, 6 and 8 of this plan.
See Map 12: Siarey's Timber Yard, Chinnor.
Mackenzie Myers, Watlington
This policy has not been saved beyond 19 January 2009 and will no longer be used.
Policy RUR15
Land at the Mackenzie Myers site is considered suitable for B1 use.
9.46
This site of 0.82 hectares is located on the edge of Watlington and is currently accessed via the Watlington Industrial Estate. It has a B8 use which is generating heavy goods vehicle movements through the surrounding villages. It is considered that a B1 use or a mixed use of housing and B1 would be more appropriate on this site, given that those uses would be unlikely to generate the type of traffic that is causing the current problems. A housing use will only be permitted, however, if appropriate arrangements for access to the site can be agreed, which do not involve taking access through the Watlington Industrial Estate. Any proposal will need to comply with the relevant policies in Sections 4, 6 and 8 of this plan.
See Map 13: Mackenzie Myers, Watlington.
Shotover Country Park
Policy RUR16
The Council will seek to ensure that the special character and qualities of Shotover are maintained and protected and that the area continues to be used for informal recreation. The provision of formal recreation facilities which would adversely affect the character of the area will not be permitted.
9.47
Although Shotover lies mainly within South Oxfordshire, it is largely owned by Oxford City Council. The area, located to the east of the City, is extensively used by local people for walking and picnicking, and other activities such as horse riding, running and orienteering take place. Most of the park is designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest and its biodiversity forms part of its special character. The Council holds the very firm view that the primary objective for Shotover should be the maintenance and protection of its special character. It should continue to provide an area which can be enjoyed by local residents for informal recreation.